Lindy’s Blog: Where Mom is Always Right

January 22, 2010

In which I take on the “C” word.

Filed under: childbirth,Health — by lindyborer @ 8:07 am
Tags: , , , ,

Photo of a baby boy, mid-cut. photo credit: Amy Arbus

As usual, I seem to have an affinity for leaving things like this to the last possible minute, and I have a hunch that because I’ve done so this baby will most likely be a boy (Murphy’s Law has a 99.9% chance of applying to me).  I’ve been in somewhat of a quandary regarding a topic of which is seldom spoken, but highly charged among parenting circles.

Nope, not vaccination.  The C-word.  Circumcision.  There.  I said it.

Okay, as usual, I try to keep things balanced here at Lindy’s (take that however you wish.)  Those of you who are recent parents realize the sensitive subject matter that circumcision is.  Let me just say this up front:  We are going to circumcise our son if this baby is a boy.  I would be just fine not doing it; however, my husband would not.  I realize that many in the “NOCIRC” camp will automatically call me a barbarian and equate our actions as the equivalent to the male form of genital mutiliation.  I realize those on the other side of the debate will think I’m stupid for even entertaining the notion of NOT getting my son snipped. 

Let me cut to the point (no pun intended):  I’m simply trying to research the possibility of getting a “dorsal penile nerve block”–that’s local anesthetic, much like Novacaine at the dentist–for the baby prior to the placing of a scalpel to what I’m told is a highly sensitive area.

Now, it’s always good to step away from “what is and what has always been done,” and to actually–with a pure mind–run the scenario through one’s head.  According to Dr. Sears (who I’ve generally found to be quite balanced and who has performed thousands of circs himself), this is how a circumcision today is commonly performed on infants before they leave the hospital:

Baby is placed on a restraining board, and straps secure his hands and feet. The tight adhesions between the foreskin and the glans (or head) of the penis are separated with a medical instrument. The foreskin is held in place by metal clamps while a cut is made into the foreskin to about one-third of its length. A metal or plastic bell is placed over the head of the penis to protect the glans, and the foreskin is pulled up over the bell and the circumferentially cut.

Easy as pie!  Sounds quite painless.  Oh wait, except that it totally DOESN’T!!!!

Let me back up.  When my first child was born, I really hadn’t looked into this at all.  When the time came for my son to go under the knife, inner reservations surfaced, but a voice in my head told me, “We live in an enlightened age.  Surely the common argument that newborns’ nervous systems aren’t fully developed and it doesn’t hurt them is completely research-based, because how could we as a society just allow a poor defenseless newborn to get his foreskin ripped away without local anesthetic on a routine basis?”  (Of course, this same “enlightened” society allows for much worse with abortion, but I digress…)

Feeling somewhat better, the nurse then came in to get my son and flippantly told us to “take a walk so you won’t hear him scream,”  and then that abhorrent woman LAUGHED.  That is something that I have never forgotten. 

Since then, I’ve learned that babies who “seem to fall into a deep sleep toward the end of the procedure” have actually passed out from the pain.  Ahem.  I AM a barbarian.

I emailed a friend about this yesterday; she has two boys.  She related this anecdote:

I was concerned about the pain, too.  At that time, we had a female pediatrician who did the procedure and this is what I remember her saying when she brought him to me afterwards—she said that yes, it hurts like the devil, and they always cry…but they can be comforted and within minutes they are fine.  And that’s the difference between pain and agony.  That has always stuck with me. 

No shit.

Her sisters, who have seven uncircumcised boys between them, likewise chimed in.  One said:

When Bryan and I realized that the ONLY reason we were being encouraged to have the boys circumcized was so they wouldn’t be laughed at in the locker room, we decided that that just wasn’t a good enough reason to have a piece of skin ripped off our little boys’ you-know-whats when they were hours old, with no anesthetic.  It was a Jewish tradition.  We’re not Jews.  Ergo, we didn’t have it done.  I don’t know anything about the block, but it sounds like a good idea to me.

Which is so true.  The locker room argument, I’ve found, is one of the top arguments in favor of the procedure.  (Must be a brutal place.)  The pressure to “look like one’s peers” is actually becoming less and less relevant, though, because more and more parents are not getting it done.  This may come as a surprise to folks my parents’ age, but it’s true.  Several friends of ours have chosen to forego the procedure for their boys. 

So, I guess there might be a new meaning to the phrase “shirts vs. skins” in locker room lingo in the near future. 

Back to Dr. Sears.  In answering the question, “Does it hurt?” he says:

Yes, it hurts. The skin of the penis of a newborn baby has pain receptors completely sensitive to clamping and cutting. The myth that newborns do not feel pain came from the observation that newborns sometimes withdraw into a deep sleep toward the end of the operation. This does not mean that they do not feel pain. Falling into a deep sleep is a retreat mechanism, a withdrawal reaction as a consequence of overwhelming pain. Not only does circumcision cause pain in the penis, the newborns over all physiology is upset. New research shows that during unanaesthetized circumcision, stress hormones rise, the heart rate speeds, and valuable blood oxygen diminishes. Babies should never be subjected to the shock of unanaesthetized circumcision.

Can the baby have anesthesia to lessen the pain?

Yes, a local anesthetic can and should be used. Painless circumcision should be a birthright. I have used a local anesthesia in nearly a thousand babies for over twenty years. It is a safe procedure and it works. Sometimes the anesthetic will not remove all the pain, but it certainly helps. Within a few hours, after the anesthetic wears off, some babies exhibit no discomfort; others will fuss for the next twenty-four hours. The most common and effective method is called a dorsal penile nerve block, in which a few drops of Xylocaine (similar to the anesthetic your dentist uses) is injected into the nerves on each side of the penis circumferentially around the base of the penis.

So there ya go.  That’s where I’m at.  I simply don’t know if a block is available around here.  I’ve heard mention of some sort of “plastic cap.”  Anyone know if this is just a convenience thing, or a mechanism to lessen the pain? 

One final argument that has been most commonly thrown at me when I’ve brought this up:  “They don’t remember it.”  Can I just say how completely stupid this is, on so many levels?  You know, I don’t remember most of my life up to probably age three or four; does this then make it okay to scrimp on anesthesia during common childhood maladies (like tonsillectomies, for example?)  How utterly ridiculous.  Mom and Dad could have saved some money when I had to get stitches at age two! 

For those out there who persist in thinking I’m off my rocker, fine, but let me just say that we mothers–especially those of us who still have small children and are about to have a baby–we’re a ruthless set.  We are like the grizzly mothers who will not hesitate to maul and kill in order to protect our young.  And that is the frame of mind that leads me to question this procedure the way it’s currently done. 

In my informal survey of asking the males in my life if they, themselves, would elect to be circumcised NOW without some sort of block, they abruptly and deliciously change their tune.  Which, to me, says it all.

Can anyone out there give me some insight?

Advertisements

11 Comments »

  1. For more insights and education, please visit this webpage, developed for expectant parents:

    http://www.icgi.org/birth_care_providers.htm

    I hope you and your husband will watch the video “The Prepuce.” If you do, you will know more than most doctors do. All of the articles here are excellent, so I hope you’ll spend some time reading the information that’s available here.

    Comment by PJ — January 22, 2010 @ 12:33 pm |Reply

  2. How about just letting boys decide for themselves…the end?

    Comment by Kiki — January 22, 2010 @ 1:53 pm |Reply

  3. Every parent needs to consider what their son will think 10 years, 15 years, 20 years down the road. The Internet is a great educational tool and many young men are learning what happened to them when they were circumcised. Many question why their parents chose to circumcise them when there was so little reason to do so. Many of these young men wish they had their full sex organ. See http://www.foreskin-restoration.net/forum/showthread.php?t=3481 for a forum discussion by sons who are unhappy with their parents decision.

    I was circumcised at birth. I don’t blame my parents for having me circumcised because I was born before the Internet and they just believed the doctors. But, I really wish I had not been circumcised. I am restoring my foreskin. Now that I am able to experience some of the benefits of having a foreskin, I really wish I had not been cut at birth.

    Comment by RestoringTally — January 22, 2010 @ 2:20 pm |Reply

  4. “In my informal survey of asking the males in my life if they, themselves, would elect to be circumcised NOW without some sort of block, they abruptly and deliciously change their tune.”

    Ok but what about being circumcised in the normal way (with anesthesia)? We’re currently agonizing over this decision for DS ourselves, but one thing that’s making me lean in favor of it is that every guy I know who didn’t have it done at birth, either had it done later or wishes he were circumcised.

    Comment by Jenny — January 22, 2010 @ 6:37 pm |Reply

  5. Jenny: I guess the point I was trying to make is that they should probably always be done with some sort of block, imo. Right now, no one around these parts uses anything to block the pain–and this is why I’m having such a hard time with it!

    So, good luck to you with your decision. It’s really no fun to think about. Like I said, if we do have another boy, we will get him circumcised, I just hope we can find a practitioner who uses some sort of anasthetic.

    Comment by lindyborer — January 22, 2010 @ 6:54 pm |Reply

  6. I see. I completely agree about the need for anesthesia. I believe the “plastic cap” which you mention is the plastibell, which is one of the methods they use for doing the circumcision, not a form of pain relief. My understanding is that the hospital methods are generally slow and painful, and the fastest and easiest way to do it is to find a mohel who will do a non-religious circumcision for you. Something about the tool they use being more efficient.

    Comment by Jenny — January 22, 2010 @ 8:34 pm |Reply

  7. This just in: I emailed my midwife to ask her about the availability of a block. She said that they will all use Lidocaine or a pain-blocking cream (which she says is very effective) UPON REQUEST.

    So, parents. It pays to be informed. I will definitely be requesting this, ahem, small courtesy on behalf of my hours-old little sweetie. Here is the study abstract from the New England Journal of Medicine confirming the efficacy and safety of the lidocaine/prilocaine cream: http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/336/17/1197

    FWIW. Thanks for all the comments and insight. It’s a terribly interesting topic.

    Comment by Lindy — January 24, 2010 @ 7:59 am |Reply

  8. Lindy,

    Have you seen the superbowl ad with Tim Tebow & his mother yet? I have not seen it but a women’s group is trying to get it stopped from airing. The ad is being paid for by a Christian group Focus on the Family. Pam Tebow is going to talk about her choice to ignore her doctor’s recommendation to abort her pregnancy with Tim in 1987 because she became sick while in the Philippines. Hopefully they show this ad – I went on the internet to vote for it to be aired during the superbowl. Coming from an someone like Tim Tebow could be very positive for younger people’s views.

    Comment by Tracey — January 26, 2010 @ 11:57 am |Reply

    • Tracey: No, I haven’t seen it, but I’ll definitely have to track it down. Hopefully they’ll air it and I can see it then. Think of all the potential for greatness that has been eradicated since Roe v. Wade! It’s such a tragedy.

      Comment by lindyborer — January 26, 2010 @ 12:18 pm |Reply

  9. This is one reason I was so glad when I found out my 4th baby was a girl. We had all 3 boys circumsized, and I still get upset when I think about it. If it were up to me alone I wouldn’t have, but since my husband is the one with the penis, I gave his opinion more weight than my own. I think, if you can get some pain block, do it. Another thing that helped me is that my father in law got some awful infection when he was 12 years old that required his being circumsized at that age–and it was not easy for him.

    Comment by Erin — February 2, 2010 @ 10:14 am |Reply

  10. There is no medical reason to have this done at birth. I’m nipped, but my boys are not. The comment that it’s a Jewish thing is correct. I have long, excuse the pun, theorized that the movement to circumcise boys at birth was initiated after WWII. Prior to that only Jews and those who might have infections were circumcised. This made them easily recognizable to the Nazi’s. One could not deny a missing foreskin, thus your Jewish heritage was confirmed. Once the it became a normal thing, again excuse the pun, the Jews could no longer be singled out. Doctor’s in the states saw no real harm because the Jews were doing it for centuries without issue and without the setting of a hospital.For my wife and I it was simple, was it medically necessary and what were the down sides medically? There was no necessity and we thought if you can teach a little girl to be clean down there you can do the same for a boy. This has proven for us to be the case.

    Comment by Andrew Turner — February 12, 2010 @ 10:21 am |Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: